And yet, yet another source corroboration

"grok, what does 'insurmountable' mean?"

Walther Hewel recorded in his diary on October 10th of 1941:

F[ührer] at table: Christianity is the rebellion against creation. It is the perversion of all the laws of nature, which, even in the smallest process of fertilization, are based upon struggle and the selection of the best.

Walther Hewels Tagebuch, Eintrag vom 10. Oktober 1941. (Irving File 75)

Translators disagree on the parenetical portion at the end of the paragraph. None of them that I’ve seen read properly to my eye. It’s likely this relates to clarifying something about the “survival of the fittest” with sperm and egg.

This is the section in reference:

Interestingly, he also awkwardly writes “Christentum” as “Chris tentum” in several other places in his diary.

Not only is this passage yet another validation of my position that Hitler hated Christ, it also corroborates the Tischgespräch (Table Talk) monologue notes we have from that exact same day.

Christianity is a rebellion against fundamental law, a protest against creation; if consistently implemented, it would lead to the breeding of inferiors.

Section “Der Krieg im Osten” (10. 10. 1941 mittags) Monologe im Führerhauptquartier Heims & Jochmann p. 59

I challenge anyone who disputes my (and many actual historians) use of these sources to provide an alternative and realistic explanation for the corroborations seen here and elsewhere that both I and Keith Woods have pointed out. Until that can be done, sporadic assertions about Bormann’s biases or ill-thought-out remarks related to the Soviet Archives and misunderstandings of microfiche technology are irrelevant to the discussion, and do nothing but mislead ignorant people.