There was a time I was more open to Third Reich revisionism, but it's clear now that there's little worth pursuing it when this is the quality of work the revisionists put out. It's almost cringe to me now.
I don't see how this omission somehow makes the point that Christianity was a Jewish subversion, its pretty clear that Hitler is saying Christianity was being used by the Jews as a tool, a Trojan Horse, to infiltrate gentile societies. He even says Jews never wanted to convert to Christianity at all. How is that him speaking bad of Christianity or Christ?
Why do they, among other hitler wannabes always lie about Hitler's true position on Christians? Antelope Hill could've ommitted parts of the speech that weren't integral to Hitler's beliefs.
There was a time I was more open to Third Reich revisionism, but it's clear now that there's little worth pursuing it when this is the quality of work the revisionists put out. It's almost cringe to me now.
If Antelope Hill is publishing for the purpose of historical retrieval, they are doing a fairly poor job of it.
I don't see how this omission somehow makes the point that Christianity was a Jewish subversion, its pretty clear that Hitler is saying Christianity was being used by the Jews as a tool, a Trojan Horse, to infiltrate gentile societies. He even says Jews never wanted to convert to Christianity at all. How is that him speaking bad of Christianity or Christ?
Why do they, among other hitler wannabes always lie about Hitler's true position on Christians? Antelope Hill could've ommitted parts of the speech that weren't integral to Hitler's beliefs.
Is antelope hill jewish? I keep hearing that.
One of them is a self-avowed Nazi.
Thanks for the help detective.
Why does Noah Burnett humiliate himself like this?